Imprecise Swing Weighting for Multi-Attribute Utility Elicitation Based on Partial Preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
We describe a novel approach to multi-attribute utility elicitation which is both general enough to cover a wide range of problems, whilst at the same time simple enough to admit reasonably straightforward calculations. We allow both utilities and probabilities to be only partially specified, through bounding. We still assume marginal utilities to be precise. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions under which our elicitation procedure is consistent. As a special case, we obtain an imprecise generalization of the well known swing weighting method for eliciting multi-attribute utility functions. An example from ecological risk assessment demonstrates our method.
منابع مشابه
Weighting Under Ambiguous Preferences and Imprecise Differences in a Cardinal Rank Ordering Process
The limited amount of good tools for supporting elicitation of preference information in multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) causes practical problem. In our experiences, this can be remedied by allowing more relaxed input statements from decision-makers, causing the elicitation process to be less cognitively demanding. Furthermore, it should not be too time consuming and must be able to ac...
متن کاملReasoning with Partial Preference Models PhD Dissertation Proposal
Classical decision theory provides a normative framework for representing and reasoning with complex preferences. Straightforward application of this theory to automate decision making is difficult due to high cost of eliciting preferences. The objective of this thesis is to develop a flexible decision-theoretic framework for eliciting and reasoning with preferences and to apply the tools and t...
متن کاملPreference Elicitation and Winner Determination in Multi-Attribute Auctions
Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions (MARAs) are excellent protocols to automate negotiation among sellers. Eliciting the buyer′s preferences and determining the winner are both challenging problems for MARAs. To solve these problems, we propose two algorithms namely MAUT* and CP-net*, which are respectively the improvement of the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and constrained CP-net. The bu...
متن کاملSolving dominance and potential optimality in imprecise multi-attribute additive problems
We consider the multicriteria decision-making problem where there is partial information on decision maker preferences, represented by means of an imprecise multiattribute additive utility function, and where the consequences of the alternatives or strategies are also possibly imprecise. Under these circumstances we consider how useful problem-solving concepts, namely nondominated, potentially ...
متن کاملThe use of multi-criteria decision analysis weight elicitation techniques in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study.
OBJECTIVE To test the applicability of multi-criteria decision analysis preference elicitation techniques in cognitively impaired individuals. METHOD A convenience sample of 16 cognitively impaired subjects and 12 healthy controls was asked to participate in a small pilot study. The subjects determined the relative importance of four decision criteria using five different weight elicitation t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017